Shark Hyperair vs. Dyson Supersonic: Which Hair Dryer Reigns Supreme?

The hair dryer market boasts a plethora of options, but two consistently rise to the top: the Shark Hyperair and the Dyson Supersonic. Both are lauded for their powerful airflow and advanced features, leaving consumers questioning which truly reigns supreme. This in-depth comparison dives into the key features and performance of each dryer, analyzing drying time, heat settings, ergonomics, and overall user experience. We put both models to the test, examining their strengths and weaknesses to determine which offers the best value and performance for your money.Our evaluation covers a range of factors, from raw airflow power (tested with a unique ping pong ball experiment) to real-world drying times on medium-length, wavy hair. We also assessed the ease of use, considering the placement of controls, weight distribution, and the comfort level during extended use. Ultimately, we aim to provide a clear and unbiased comparison, helping you decide which high-performance hair dryer best suits your needs and budget, while also considering a strong contender from Babyliss Pro.

Pros And Cons

Read more: Top 6 Andis Hair Dryers: Our Best Picks

Power and Drying Time: A Head-to-Head Comparison

Both the Shark Hyperair and Dyson Supersonic boast impressive drying power. A ping pong ball test revealed the Shark's airflow propelled the ball higher, suggesting potentially more powerful airflow. However, in real-world usage, both dryers dried my medium-length, wavy hair in roughly the same time – around 20 minutes. This suggests the difference in raw power might not translate to a significant difference in drying time for typical hair lengths.

Both dryers offer three speed settings, with each increment noticeably increasing power. This allows users to customize the airflow based on their hair type and desired styling. The consistency in drying time suggests that the power difference may be less important than other factors, like nozzle design and heat distribution.

Heat Settings and Temperature Control

Both the Shark and Dyson hair dryers feature three heat settings: low, medium, and high. For my hair type, the medium heat setting provided the optimal balance of drying power and minimizing heat damage. The temperature differences between the two dryers were negligible in testing; both reached a maximum temperature around 100-110 degrees Celcius.

This similarity in heat settings and maximum temperatures suggests that neither dryer provides a significant advantage in terms of heat protection. The ability to select different heat settings allows for customized heat application for different hair types and styling techniques.

Ergonomics and Design: A Matter of Preference

The Dyson's unique motor placement in the handle, while intended to improve balance, resulted in an unexpected weight distribution that felt somewhat cumbersome, especially during overhead styling. The Shark's more conventional design, with the motor in the head, felt more balanced and ergonomic across various styling positions.

While the Dyson's unconventional design might initially cause confusion, it is used in the same way as any other dryer. The Shark's lighter weight (1.1 lbs vs. Dyson's 0.9 lbs) combined with better weight distribution made it significantly more comfortable to use for extended periods.

Features and Usability: Minor Differences

Both dryers feature intuitive controls with easily accessible speed and heat settings. The placement of these buttons prevents accidental adjustments during styling. The cool shot button on both dryers provides added control for setting styles. The Dyson's cool shot button is self-locking, offering a small advantage in usability over the Shark's.

The subtle differences in features are minor, and ultimately neither model provides a clear advantage. The convenience of the Dyson's self-locking cool shot is a minor benefit.

Overall Results and Conclusion

Both the Shark Hyperair and Dyson Supersonic delivered a comparable hair styling experience. While the Shark showcased slightly more powerful airflow in the ping pong ball test, this did not translate into a notable time difference during actual hair drying. The Shark also proved to be more ergonomic and comfortable to hold due to its superior weight distribution.

Considering the performance parity and the substantially lower price point, the Shark Hyperair emerges as the more value-driven choice. However, the reviewer also highlighted the Babyliss Pro Nano Titanium dryer as their overall best pick, emphasizing its superior performance and affordability compared to both the Shark and Dyson.